— Know what they know.
/
Not Investment Advice

OMDA NASDAQ

Omada Health
1W: +3.6% 1M: -12.6% 3M: -10.8% YTD: +36.7% 1Y: -9.2%
$20.37
-0.04 (-0.20%)
 
Weekly Expected Move ±8.0%
$17 $19 $20 $22 $24
NASDAQ · Healthcare · Medical - Healthcare Information Services · Tech Score Sell · Power 45 · $1.2B mcap · 5M float · 28.92% daily turnover · Short 57% of daily vol
Overview News Chart Smart Money Financials Income Statement Cash Flow Balance Sheet Earnings
Dividends Analysis Technicals Weather Peers ESG Institutions ETF Exposure Dark Pool Short Interest Supply Chain

Edge Score

Quantitative competitive moat analysis scoring five pillars of durable advantage — cost leadership, brand intangibles, switching costs, network effects, and efficient scale — using industry percentile rankings on a 0–100 scale.

WEAK EDGE
53.6 / 100
NoneWeakNarrowWide
Primary source: Cost Advantage  ·  ROIC: -1.5%
Cost Advantage ★
68
Intangibles
51
Switching Cost
64
Network Effect
33
Scale
42
The Edge Score quantifies a company's competitive moat using five pillars: Cost Advantage (20%, operating margin and SG&A efficiency vs industry peers), Intangible Assets (25%, gross margin premium, R&D intensity, brand pricing power), Switching Costs (25%, revenue stability, earnings consistency, customer retention proxied by operating leverage), Network Effects (15%, revenue growth with expanding margins, market share dominance), and Efficient Scale (15%, market concentration, ROIC sustainability). Each pillar is scored 0–100 using industry percentile rankings, then weighted into a composite. Wide ≥ 70, Narrow ≥ 55, Weak ≥ 40, None < 40. OMDA shows a Weak competitive edge (53.6/100) — limited structural advantages that may face competitive pressure. The primary source of advantage is Cost Advantage. Negative ROIC of -1.5% indicates the company is currently destroying value, though this may reflect a growth investment phase.

Analyst Insights

Wall Street analyst consensus based on price targets and buy/sell/hold recommendations from institutional research coverage over the trailing 12 months.

Analyst Price Targets
$24
Low
$28
Avg Target
$35
High
Based on 4 analysts since Aug 6, 2026 earnings
Analyst Recommendations
Strong Buy: 0Buy: 11Hold: 2Sell: 0Strong Sell: 0
Rating Summary
ConsensusBuy
Avg Target$27.71
Analysts7
Price Target Change History
DateFirmAnalystOldNewChangeUpside @ CallStock@Call
2026-09-11 Barclays Saket Kalia $25 $27 +2 +25.6% $21.50
2026-08-12 Robert W. Baird Vikram Kesavabhotla $24 $25 +1 +4.1% $24.01
2026-08-10 BTIG David Larsen $30 $35 +5 +47.9% $23.67
2026-08-07 BMO Capital — Initiated $24 — +22.8% $19.54
2026-08-03 Barclays Saket Kalia $22 $25 +3 +26.0% $19.84
2026-07-21 Canaccord Genuity — $24 $28 +4 +17.2% $23.89
2026-07-17 BTIG — Initiated $30 — +26.7% $23.67
2026-06-22 Morgan Stanley Craig Hettenbach $32 $30 -2 +65.9% $18.08
2026-05-08 Evercore ISI — $15 $20 +5 +29.2% $15.48
2026-05-08 Wells Fargo — $17 $18 +1 +9.8% $16.40
2026-05-08 Canaccord Genuity — Initiated $24 — +46.3% $16.40
2026-04-08 Evercore ISI Elizabeth Anderson $27 $15 -12 +19.7% $12.53
2026-01-16 Goldman Sachs David Roman $29 $26 -3 +66.1% $15.65
2026-01-09 Goldman Sachs — Initiated $29 — +76.4% $16.44
2026-01-08 Wells Fargo — Initiated $17 — +3.4% $16.44
2026-01-05 Barclays Saket Kalia Initiated $22 — +47.7% $14.90
2025-12-18 Morgan Stanley — Initiated $32 — +118.9% $14.62
2025-10-08 Evercore ISI Elizabeth Anderson Initiated $27 — +8.0% $25.00
2025-09-05 Robert W. Baird — Initiated $24 — -1.2% $24.28
2025-07-01 Needham — Initiated $23 — +26.0% $18.25

Financial Rating

Composite financial health rating (A+ to F) based on discounted cash flow valuation, return on equity, return on assets, debt-to-equity leverage, and relative P/E and P/B multiples.

C
Oct 02, 2026
DCF
1
ROE
2
ROA
4
D/E
1
P/E
1
P/B
2
The Financial Rating evaluates six fundamental factors — discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation, return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA), debt-to-equity leverage (D/E), and relative price-to-earnings (P/E) and price-to-book (P/B) multiples — each scored 1–5. OMDA receives an overall rating of C. Strongest factors: ROA (4/5). Areas of concern: DCF (1/5), ROE (2/5), D/E (1/5), P/E (1/5), P/B (2/5).
Rating Change History
DateFromTo
2026-08-07 D+ C
2026-02-26 C D+
2026-02-24 D+ C

InsiderStreet Scorecard

Proprietary multi-factor scorecard rating companies across seven fundamental dimensions — profitability, balance sheet strength, earnings quality, growth, value, momentum, and safety — each scored 0–100.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 71 Grade A
Profitability
30
Balance Sheet
97
Earnings Quality
69
Growth
75
Value
38
Momentum
100
Safety
100
Cash Flow
77
The InsiderStreet Scorecard rates companies across eight dimensions: Profitability (margins, ROA, ROE), Balance Sheet (leverage, liquidity, coverage), Earnings Quality (accruals, cash conversion), Growth (revenue and earnings trajectory), Value (P/E, P/B, earnings yield, Graham criteria), Momentum (revenue and earnings acceleration), Safety (Altman Z-Score risk adjustment), and Cash Flow (operating cash flow quality, FCF conversion, cash coverage). The overall score blends 35% quality, 35% value, and 30% momentum, with a penalty for distress-zone Altman scores. OMDA scores highest in Safety (100/100) and lowest in Profitability (30/100). An overall grade of A places OMDA among the highest-quality companies in its peer group.

Risk & Quality Signals

Academic financial models used by institutional investors to assess bankruptcy risk, earnings manipulation, financial strength, and credit quality.

Altman Z-Score
11.01
Safe Zone
Piotroski F-Score
7/9
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✓ ✓
Beneish M-Score
-2.26
Unlikely Manipulator
Ohlson O-Score
-9.98
Bankruptcy prob: 0.0%
Low Risk
Credit Rating
AA
Score: 89.0/100
Trend: Improving
Earnings Quality
75/100
OCF/NI: 5.50x
Accruals: -6.1%
The Altman Z-Score (1968) combines five ratios — working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, market value of equity, and sales, all relative to total assets or liabilities — into a single bankruptcy predictor. OMDA scores 11.01, placing it in the Safe Zone (safe > 2.99, distress < 1.81). Bankruptcy is statistically unlikely within the next two years. The Piotroski F-Score (2000) is a 9-point binary checklist — four profitability tests (positive ROA, positive cash flow, improving ROA, cash flow exceeding net income), three leverage tests (declining debt ratio, improving current ratio, no share dilution), and two efficiency tests (improving gross margin, improving asset turnover). Each pass scores 1 point. OMDA scores 7/9, signaling strong financial health across all three dimensions. The Beneish M-Score (1999) is an 8-variable model that detects earnings manipulation by comparing year-over-year changes in receivables, gross margins, asset quality, sales growth, depreciation, SG&A, leverage, and accruals. Scores above −1.78 statistically resemble past manipulators. OMDA's score of -2.26 falls below this threshold, suggesting earnings are unlikely to be manipulated. The Ohlson O-Score (1980) is a 9-variable logistic regression that estimates bankruptcy probability using firm size, leverage, working capital, current ratio, profitability (ROA), cash flow coverage, negative equity flag, consecutive losses flag, and earnings trajectory. The raw score is converted to a probability via logistic transformation. OMDA's implied 0.0% bankruptcy probability is well within safe territory. Our Credit Rating model scores companies on five weighted components — solvency (30%), earning power (25%), leverage (20%), liquidity (15%), and cash flow quality (10%) — then blends the absolute score with sector and industry peer rankings. For companies with large buyback programs, equity is adjusted by adding back cumulative 5-year repurchases (capped at 80% of FCF generated) to avoid penalizing shareholder-friendly capital allocation. OMDA receives an estimated rating of AA (score: 89.0/100), with a improving trend. The Earnings Quality score measures how well reported earnings are backed by real cash. It evaluates the operating cash flow to net income ratio (OCF/NI ≥ 1.0 means every dollar of earnings is cash-backed) and the accruals ratio (the gap between earnings and cash flow relative to assets — lower is better). OMDA's score of 75/100 is high — cash flows strongly support reported earnings.

Valuation

Key valuation multiples comparing the stock's market price to its earnings, revenue, book value, and cash flows. Lower multiples may indicate relative undervaluation versus peers.

P/E
300.00x
PEG
0.49x
P/S
3.91x
P/B
4.81x
P/FCF
57.99x
P/OCF
59.26x
EV/EBITDA
100.56x
EV/Revenue
3.82x
EV/EBIT
271.71x
EV/FCF
48.83x
Earnings Yield
0.31%
FCF Yield
1.72%
Shareholder Yield
0.00%
Graham Number
$2.45
Equity-based multiples (P/E, P/B, P/FCF) compare the stock price to per-share fundamentals and are affected by capital structure. Enterprise value multiples (EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, EV/FCF) strip out debt and cash, making them more useful for cross-company comparisons regardless of how companies are financed. The Graham Number — √(22.5 × EPS × Book Value) — is Benjamin Graham's formula for the maximum price a defensive investor should pay. At 300.0x earnings, OMDA is priced for high growth expectations. Graham's intrinsic value formula yields $2.45 per share, 733% below the current price.

DuPont Decomposition (5-Factor)

The 5-factor DuPont framework breaks Return on Equity into its component drivers — tax efficiency, interest burden, operating profitability, asset utilization, and financial leverage — to reveal what truly drives shareholder returns.

Tax Burden
1.000
NI / EBT
×
Interest Burden
0.990
EBT / EBIT
×
EBIT Margin
0.014
EBIT / Rev
×
Asset Turnover
0.982
Rev / Assets
×
Equity Multiplier
1.352
Assets / Equity
=
ROE
1.8%
The 5-factor DuPont identity decomposes ROE as: Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier = ROE. This reveals whether returns are driven by operating performance, financial leverage, or tax efficiency — three very different sources of profitability. OMDA's ROE of 1.8% is driven by Asset Turnover (0.982), indicating efficient use of assets to generate revenue. A tax burden ratio of 1.00 indicates minimal tax leakage — the company retains over 90% of pre-tax earnings.

Graham-Dodd Adjusted Valuation

Our adaptation of Graham's growth formula (Fair P/E = 8.5 + 2g) from The Intelligent Investor. The classic version relies on analyst growth projections, which can be unreliable. This adjusted model substitutes the company's realized 3-year EPS CAGR — a backward-looking, verifiable measure of actual earnings power — grounding the valuation in demonstrated performance rather than forecasts.

Two adjustments we make, and why. Growth is capped at 15%. Graham defined g as expected growth over the next seven to ten years, not last year's rate. Across US companies since 1994 the median realized 7-year EPS growth is 5–8% regardless of how fast a company grew beforehand, and of 4,457 company-quarters that grew faster than 200%, none sustained it. Uncapped, the formula assigned fair multiples in the hundreds to companies that had never held that rate — and scored worse than simply reading the P/E. Capped, it carries real information. The verdict has three states, not two. Tested over 377,249 stock-months, this ratio only separates outcomes at its extremes: below 0.25 beat the universe by 1.3 points a year, above 3.0 lagged by 2.7, and everything in between sat inside a one-point band. Rather than call two-thirds of the market "undervalued" on a threshold of 1.0, we say Neutral where the model cannot tell — which is most of the time.

Adj. Growth Rate
0.00%
Fair P/E
8.50x
Intrinsic Value
$0.57
Price/Value
38.36x
Margin of Safety
-3735.86%
Premium
3735.86%
Assessment
Overvalued
Graham's classic formula uses analyst-projected growth to estimate a fair P/E (8.5 + 2g). Our adjusted version replaces that projection with OMDA's realized 0.0% 3-year EPS CAGR, capped at 15% — demonstrated performance rather than forecasts, held to a rate companies have historically sustained. OMDA trades at a 3736% premium to its adjusted intrinsic value of $0.57, suggesting the market is pricing in future growth beyond what historical earnings support. The adjusted fair P/E of 8.5x compares to the current market P/E of 300.0x.

Profitability Trends

Historical profitability ratios tracking how efficiently the company converts revenue into returns for shareholders over time.

Leverage & Solvency Trends

Debt and liquidity metrics showing the company's financial leverage and ability to meet short-term and long-term obligations.

Efficiency & Working Capital Trends

Operating efficiency metrics measuring how quickly the company converts inventory to sales, collects receivables, and manages its cash conversion cycle.

Growth Trends (YoY %)

Year-over-year growth rates for key financial metrics, showing the trajectory of revenue, earnings, and cash flow generation.

Earnings Stability

R-squared of linear regression measuring how predictably revenue, earnings, and margins follow a trend over the trailing 5 years. 1.0 = perfectly predictable; lower values indicate erratic or cyclical behavior.

Monte Carlo Price Simulation

Geometric Brownian Motion with 1,000 antithetic paths over 1 year, seeded from 333 days of historical volatility. Percentile bands show the range of statistically plausible outcomes — this is a statistical model, not a forecast.

Current Price
$20.37
Median 1Y
$15.16
5th Pctile
$4.92
95th Pctile
$46.47
Ann. Volatility
64.2%
Analyst Target
$27.71
25th–75th percentile 5th–95th percentile Median path Historical Analyst target

Executive Compensation

C-suite compensation breakdown including salary, stock awards, options, and incentive pay. The CEO-to-employee pay ratio and Gini coefficient measure pay distribution fairness.

C-Suite Compensation

ExecutiveSalaryStockTotal
Sean Duffy
Chief Executive Officer
 $525,000 $2,750,000 $4,718,175
Wei-Li Shao
President
 $450,000 $1,500,000 $3,163,894
Steven Cook Financial
ancial Officer
 $400,000 $1,250,000 $2,137,672

CEO Pay Ratio

30:1
CEO-to-Employee Pay Ratio
CEO Total Comp: $4,718,175
Avg Employee Cost (SGA/emp): $154,885
Employees: 916

C-Suite Pay Equality (Gini)

CEO Compensation Mix

Workforce & Productivity

Workforce efficiency metrics measuring revenue, profit, and R&D spend per employee — key indicators of operational leverage and human capital productivity.

Employees
916
Revenue / Employee
$284,072
Rev: $260,209,999
Profit / Employee
$-13,950
NI: $-12,778,000
SGA / Employee
$154,885
Avg labor cost proxy
R&D / Employee
$44,318
Innovation spend

Scaling Efficiency

All Ratios & Metrics

Complete fundamental data with up to 20 periods of history, sparkline trends, and current values across 13 categories and 130+ financial metrics.

Profitability
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
ROE -2.5% -3.9% -1.4% -2.7% 1.8% 1.84%
ROA -1.8% -3.0% -1.1% -2.1% 1.4% 1.36%
ROIC -16.3% -28.9% -37.0% -29.5% -1.5% -1.50%
ROCE -1.7% -3.4% -1.0% -2.2% 1.7% 1.72%
Gross Margin 65.5% 66.3% 70.8% 62.4% 72.6% 72.62%
Operating Margin -7.1% -3.7% 4.3% -6.1% 4.0% 4.04%
Net Margin -8.7% -4.7% 6.8% -3.8% 6.0% 6.03%
EBITDA Margin -4.7% -2.7% 8.7% -1.9% 9.6% 9.56%
FCF Margin 4.2% 9.4% 16.3% 7.6% 7.8% 7.81%
OCF Margin 4.7% 10.0% 16.7% 8.0% 7.6% 7.65%
ROIC Economic snapshot only -0.19%
Cash ROA snapshot only 7.22%
Cash ROIC snapshot only 76.34%
CROIC snapshot only 78.01%
NOPAT Margin snapshot only -0.15%
Pretax Margin snapshot only 1.39%
R&D / Revenue snapshot only 12.01%
SGA / Revenue snapshot only 40.40%
SBC / Revenue snapshot only 4.39%
Valuation
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
P/E Ratio -197.51 -150.17 -276.88 -117.57 326.05 300.000
P/S Ratio 17.09 9.85 4.49 2.61 4.53 3.909
P/B Ratio 4.90 5.87 4.01 3.16 5.55 4.810
P/FCF 405.48 104.64 27.64 34.53 57.99 57.992
P/OCF 367.03 98.13 26.83 32.87 59.26 59.263
EV/EBITDA -298.71 -229.76 361.74 1077.18 100.56 100.564
EV/Revenue 13.94 8.32 3.41 1.87 3.82 3.816
EV/EBIT -202.94 -145.53 -314.88 -102.20 271.71 271.707
EV/FCF 330.81 88.34 20.98 24.66 48.83 48.832
Earnings Yield -0.5% -0.7% -0.4% -0.9% 0.3% 0.31%
FCF Yield 0.2% 1.0% 3.6% 2.9% 1.7% 1.72%
PEG Ratio snapshot only 0.487
Price/Tangible Book snapshot only 5.899
EV/OCF snapshot only 49.902
EV/Gross Profit snapshot only 5.596
Shareholder Yield snapshot only 0.00%
Graham Number snapshot only $2.45
Leverage & Solvency
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
Current Ratio 4.68 3.64 3.60 3.92 3.91 3.907
Quick Ratio 4.62 3.59 3.54 3.87 3.85 3.852
Debt/Equity 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
Net Debt/Equity -0.90 -0.91 -0.97 -0.90 -0.88 -0.877
Debt/Assets 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
Debt/EBITDA -10.46 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
Net Debt/EBITDA 67.43 42.41 -114.75 -431.29 -18.86 -18.864
Interest Coverage -3.85 -5.11 -1.52 -3.50 10.93 10.930
Equity Multiplier 1.41 1.32 1.33 1.29 1.30 1.299
Cash Ratio snapshot only 2.937
Debt Service Coverage snapshot only 29.530
Defensive Interval snapshot only 479.9 days
Efficiency & Turnover
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
Asset Turnover 0.20 0.45 0.67 0.94 0.98 0.982
Inventory Turnover 6.11 14.03 14.79 24.98 25.97 25.974
Receivables Turnover 1.84 3.12 5.93 7.09 6.89 6.894
Payables Turnover 2.86 8.26 6.46 11.81 10.26 10.261
DSO 198 117 62 52 53 52.9 days
DIO 60 26 25 15 14 14.1 days
DPO 128 44 57 31 36 35.6 days
Cash Conversion Cycle 130 99 30 35 31 31.4 days
Fixed Asset Turnover snapshot only 34.047
Operating Cycle snapshot only 67.0 days
Cash Velocity snapshot only 1.397
Capital Intensity snapshot only 1.060
Growth (YoY)
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
Revenue — — — — 4.0% 4.05%
Net Income — — — — 1.8% 1.81%
EPS — — — — 1.7% 1.73%
FCF — — — — 8.4% 8.36%
EBITDA — — — — 5.1% 5.10%
Op. Income — — — — 89.3% 89.32%
OCF Growth snapshot only 7.29%
Asset Growth snapshot only 8.33%
Equity Growth snapshot only 17.98%
Debt Growth snapshot only -1.00%
Shares Change snapshot only 11.56%
Growth Quality
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
Revenue Stability — — — — — —
Earnings Stability — — — — — —
Margin Stability — — — — — —
Rev. Growth Consistency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.500
Earn. Growth Consistency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.500
FCF Positive Streak 0 0 0 0 1 0
Earnings Persistence — — — — — —
Earnings Smoothness — — — — — —
ROE Trend — — — — — —
Gross Margin Trend — — — — — —
FCF Margin Trend — — — — — —
Sustainable Growth Rate — — — — 1.8% 1.84%
Internal Growth Rate — — — — 1.4% 1.38%
Cash Flow Quality
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
OCF/Net Income -0.54 -1.53 -10.32 -3.58 5.50 5.502
FCF/OCF 0.91 0.94 0.97 0.95 1.02 1.022
FCF/Net Income snapshot only 5.622
OCF/EBITDA snapshot only 2.015
CapEx/Revenue 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 0.2% 0.17%
CapEx/Depreciation snapshot only 0.070
Accruals Ratio -0.03 -0.07 -0.12 -0.10 -0.06 -0.061
Sloan Accruals snapshot only -0.003
Cash Flow Adequacy snapshot only 45.636
Earnings Quality Score snapshot only 0.750
Dividends & Buybacks
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
Dividend Yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%
Dividend/Share $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Payout Ratio — — — — 0.0% 0.00%
FCF Payout Ratio 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%
Total Payout Ratio — — — — 0.0% 0.00%
Div. Increase Streak — — — — — —
Chowder Number — — — — — —
Buyback Yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%
Net Buyback Yield -15.6% -12.8% -18.1% -23.0% -1.0% -1.01%
Total Shareholder Return -15.6% -12.8% -18.1% -23.0% -1.0% -1.01%
DuPont Factors
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
Tax Burden (NI/EBT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000
Interest Burden (EBT/EBIT) 1.26 1.15 1.50 1.22 0.99 0.990
EBIT Margin -0.07 -0.06 -0.01 -0.02 0.01 0.014
Asset Turnover 0.20 0.45 0.67 0.94 0.98 0.982
Equity Multiplier 1.41 1.32 1.33 1.29 1.35 1.352
Per Share
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
EPS (Diluted TTM) $-0.09 $-0.15 $-0.06 $-0.11 $0.07 $0.07
Book Value/Share $3.74 $3.77 $3.93 $3.97 $3.95 $4.23
Tangible Book/Share $3.45 $3.49 $3.66 $3.72 $3.72 $3.72
Revenue/Share $1.07 $2.24 $3.51 $4.81 $4.84 $5.19
FCF/Share $0.05 $0.21 $0.57 $0.36 $0.38 $0.38
OCF/Share $0.05 $0.23 $0.59 $0.38 $0.37 $0.40
Cash/Share $3.89 $3.44 $3.80 $3.59 $3.47 $3.71
EBITDA/Share $-0.05 $-0.08 $0.03 $0.01 $0.18 $0.18
Debt/Share $0.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Net Debt/Share $-3.37 $-3.44 $-3.80 $-3.59 $-3.47 $-3.47
Academic Models
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
Altman Z-Score — — — — — 11.009
Altman Z-Prime snapshot only 19.486
Piotroski F-Score 3 3 3 3 7 7
Beneish M-Score — — — — -2.26 -2.260
Ohlson O-Score snapshot only -9.977
ROIC (Greenblatt) snapshot only 1.90%
Net-Net WC snapshot only $3.43
EVA snapshot only $-3566700.00
Credit
Metric Trend Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Current
Credit Rating snapshot only AA
Credit Score 66.54 67.91 69.52 68.44 89.00 89.000
Credit Grade snapshot only 3
Credit Trend snapshot only 22.461
Implied Spread (bps) snapshot only 80.000
Industry Credit Rank snapshot only 90
Sector Credit Rank snapshot only 86

Sign in to InsiderStreet

You'll also get our free weekly newsletter with
smart money signals, market insights, and alpha ideas.
Unsubscribe anytime.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. Data sourced from SEC filings. Privacy Terms