$62.97

+2.59 (+4.29%)

After Hours: $60.69 (-2.28, -3.62%)

Weekly Expected Move ±6.1%

$52 $56 $59 $63 $67

NASDAQ · Basic Materials · Chemicals - Specialty · Tech Score Buy · Power 65 · $9.6B mcap · 83M float · 3.67% daily turnover · Short 37% of daily vol

Credit Risk of going bust: higher than 61% of companies Debt: 20.1% of company value Bonds: $87.4M held by 186 funds, 140 bp over Treasuries → details ▾

Of US companies ranked in the middle of the pack, about 1 in 580 filed for bankruptcy within a year (2020-2025).
If the stock fell to about $1.80 (down 97%), Solstice Advanced Materials Inc. would be worth roughly what it owes.
Total debt $2.41B against a stock market value of $9.59B.
Distance to default 4.17 (Merton model): prices to 2026-10-26, balance sheet 2026-06-30, debt counted $1.38B (short-term plus half of long-term), stock volatility 54.5%; Altman Z 2.61. A ranking and a back-test, not a forecast.
Bond figures are fund-reported marks (SEC N-PORT) as of Jul 2026. How these are computed.

Edge Score

Quantitative competitive moat analysis scoring five pillars of durable advantage — cost leadership, brand intangibles, switching costs, network effects, and efficient scale — using industry percentile rankings on a 0–100 scale.

NARROW EDGE

56.7 / 100

NoneWeakNarrowWide

Primary source: Cost Advantage · ROIC: 11.8%

Cost Advantage ★

Intangibles

Switching Cost

Network Effect

Scale

The Edge Score quantifies a company's competitive moat using five pillars: Cost Advantage (20%, operating margin and SG&A efficiency vs industry peers), Intangible Assets (25%, gross margin premium, R&D intensity, brand pricing power), Switching Costs (25%, revenue stability, earnings consistency, customer retention proxied by operating leverage), Network Effects (15%, revenue growth with expanding margins, market share dominance), and Efficient Scale (15%, market concentration, ROIC sustainability). Each pillar is scored 0–100 using industry percentile rankings, then weighted into a composite. Wide ≥ 70, Narrow ≥ 55, Weak ≥ 40, None < 40. SOLS has a Narrow competitive edge (56.7/100) — meaningful but not impregnable advantages over competitors. The primary source of advantage is Cost Advantage. ROIC of 11.8% suggests modest returns relative to capital deployed.

Analyst Insights

Wall Street analyst consensus based on price targets and buy/sell/hold recommendations from institutional research coverage over the trailing 12 months.

Analyst Price Targets

$73

Low

$81

Avg Target

$87

High

Based on 7 analysts since Jul 30, 2026 earnings

Analyst Recommendations

Strong Buy: 0Buy: 4Hold: 1Sell: 0Strong Sell: 0

Rating Summary

ConsensusBuy

Avg Target$80.57

Analysts7

Price Target Change History

Date	Firm	Analyst	Old	New	Change	Upside @ Call	Stock@Call
2026-10-21	BMO Capital	John McNulty	$101	$87	-14	+38.0%	$63.06
2026-10-12	Barclays	Aleksey Yefremov	Initiated	$73	—	+20.2%	$60.71
2026-10-07	Seaport Global	—	Initiated	$80	—	+30.6%	$61.27
2026-10-05	UBS	Joshua Spector	$80	$76	-4	+31.7%	$57.70
2026-09-03	Jefferies	Laurence Alexander	Initiated	$86	—	+41.0%	$60.99
2026-07-31	RBC Capital	—	$102	$82	-20	+35.8%	$60.38
2026-07-31	UBS	—	$78	$80	+2	+36.8%	$58.48
2026-07-22	Vertical Research	—	$90	$79	-11	+31.5%	$60.08
2026-07-14	Mizuho Securities	John Roberts	$95	$70	-25	+10.5%	$63.36
2026-07-13	UBS	Joshua Spector	$88	$78	-10	+27.2%	$61.30
2026-07-09	Truist Financial	—	$48	$75	+27	+19.0%	$63.05
2026-07-09	Truist Financial	Peter Osterland	$90	$48	-42	-21.3%	$61.01
2026-07-01	Mizuho Securities	—	$80	$95	+15	+7.2%	$88.60
2026-06-30	RBC Capital	—	$100	$102	+2	+23.6%	$82.54
2026-06-08	Truist Financial	Peter Osterland	Initiated	$90	—	+11.1%	$81.02
2026-06-05	RBC Capital	—	$75	$100	+25	+18.1%	$84.67
2026-06-05	BMO Capital	—	$90	$101	+11	+19.0%	$84.86
2026-05-14	Vertical Research	—	$58	$90	+32	+1.6%	$88.57
2026-05-08	UBS	—	$87	$88	+1	+12.5%	$78.20
2026-02-13	Mizuho Securities	John Roberts	$65	$80	+15	+2.5%	$78.03
2026-02-12	UBS	Joshua Spector	$75	$87	+12	+4.9%	$82.92
2026-02-12	BMO Capital	—	Initiated	$90	—	+7.9%	$83.40
2026-02-12	Mizuho Securities	John Roberts	$54	$65	+11	-13.2%	$74.92
2026-01-29	UBS	—	$61	$75	+14	+18.2%	$63.46
2026-01-20	RBC Capital	—	Initiated	$75	—	+23.2%	$60.89
2026-01-12	UBS	Joshua Spector	$58	$61	+3	+16.5%	$52.36
2026-01-07	Vertical Research	—	Initiated	$58	—	+16.6%	$49.73
2025-12-01	Alembic Global	—	Initiated	$60	—	+25.8%	$47.68
2025-11-25	UBS	—	$62	$58	-4	+27.6%	$45.47
2025-11-03	UBS	Joshua Spector	Initiated	$62	—	+37.6%	$45.07
2025-10-31	Mizuho Securities	—	Initiated	$54	—	+10.8%	$48.74

Financial Rating

Composite financial health rating (A+ to F) based on discounted cash flow valuation, return on equity, return on assets, debt-to-equity leverage, and relative P/E and P/B multiples.

Oct 27, 2026

DCF

ROE

ROA

D/E

P/E

P/B

The Financial Rating evaluates six fundamental factors — discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation, return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA), debt-to-equity leverage (D/E), and relative price-to-earnings (P/E) and price-to-book (P/B) multiples — each scored 1–5. SOLS receives an overall rating of B. Strongest factors: DCF (5/5), ROE (4/5), ROA (4/5). Areas of concern: D/E (1/5), P/E (1/5), P/B (1/5).

Rating Change History

Date	From	To
2026-08-31	B-	B
2026-08-04	B	B-
2026-07-31	C	B
2026-07-30	B	C
2026-07-01	B-	B
2026-05-18	B	B-
2026-05-14	B-	B
2026-05-11	B	B-
2026-05-06	B+	B
2026-05-04	B	B+

InsiderStreet Scorecard

Proprietary multi-factor scorecard rating companies across seven fundamental dimensions — profitability, balance sheet strength, earnings quality, growth, value, momentum, and safety — each scored 0–100.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 45 Grade B

Profitability

Balance Sheet

Earnings Quality

Growth

—

Value

Momentum

—

Safety

Cash Flow

The InsiderStreet Scorecard rates companies across eight dimensions: Profitability (margins, ROA, ROE), Balance Sheet (leverage, liquidity, coverage), Earnings Quality (accruals, cash conversion), Growth (revenue and earnings trajectory), Value (P/E, P/B, earnings yield, Graham criteria), Momentum (revenue and earnings acceleration), Safety (Altman Z-Score risk adjustment), and Cash Flow (operating cash flow quality, FCF conversion, cash coverage). The overall score blends 35% quality, 35% value, and 30% momentum, with a penalty for distress-zone Altman scores. SOLS scores highest in Safety (65/100) and lowest in Value (29/100). A grade of B indicates above-average fundamentals with room for improvement in select areas.

Risk & Quality Signals

Academic financial models used by institutional investors to assess bankruptcy risk, earnings manipulation, financial strength, and credit quality.

Altman Z-Score

2.98

Grey Zone

Piotroski F-Score

4/9

✓ ✓ ✗ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✓ ✗ ✗

Beneish M-Score

—

Ohlson O-Score

-7.09

Bankruptcy prob: 0.1%

Low Risk

Credit Rating

BBB

Score: 57.7/100

Earnings Quality

75/100

OCF/NI: 2.56x

Accruals: -6.5%

The Altman Z-Score (1968) combines five ratios — working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, market value of equity, and sales, all relative to total assets or liabilities — into a single bankruptcy predictor. SOLS scores 2.98, placing it in the Grey Zone (safe > 2.99, distress < 1.81). Financial distress is possible and warrants monitoring. The Piotroski F-Score (2000) is a 9-point binary checklist — four profitability tests (positive ROA, positive cash flow, improving ROA, cash flow exceeding net income), three leverage tests (declining debt ratio, improving current ratio, no share dilution), and two efficiency tests (improving gross margin, improving asset turnover). Each pass scores 1 point. SOLS scores 4/9, indicating moderate financial health — some areas of strength offset by weaknesses in others. The Ohlson O-Score (1980) is a 9-variable logistic regression that estimates bankruptcy probability using firm size, leverage, working capital, current ratio, profitability (ROA), cash flow coverage, negative equity flag, consecutive losses flag, and earnings trajectory. The raw score is converted to a probability via logistic transformation. SOLS's implied 0.1% bankruptcy probability is well within safe territory. Our Credit Rating model scores companies on five weighted components — solvency (30%), earning power (25%), leverage (20%), liquidity (15%), and cash flow quality (10%) — then blends the absolute score with sector and industry peer rankings. For companies with large buyback programs, equity is adjusted by adding back cumulative 5-year repurchases (capped at 80% of FCF generated) to avoid penalizing shareholder-friendly capital allocation. SOLS receives an estimated rating of BBB (score: 57.7/100). The Earnings Quality score measures how well reported earnings are backed by real cash. It evaluates the operating cash flow to net income ratio (OCF/NI ≥ 1.0 means every dollar of earnings is cash-backed) and the accruals ratio (the gap between earnings and cash flow relative to assets — lower is better). SOLS's score of 75/100 is high — cash flows strongly support reported earnings.

Valuation

Key valuation multiples comparing the stock's market price to its earnings, revenue, book value, and cash flows. Lower multiples may indicate relative undervaluation versus peers.

P/E

47.21x

PEG

-1.22x

P/S

2.44x

P/B

6.29x

P/FCF

45.68x

P/OCF

22.51x

EV/EBITDA

23.69x

EV/Revenue

5.05x

EV/EBIT

31.80x

EV/FCF

51.05x

Earnings Yield

1.74%

FCF Yield

2.19%

Shareholder Yield

0.17%

Graham Number

$18.56

Equity-based multiples (P/E, P/B, P/FCF) compare the stock price to per-share fundamentals and are affected by capital structure. Enterprise value multiples (EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, EV/FCF) strip out debt and cash, making them more useful for cross-company comparisons regardless of how companies are financed. The Graham Number — √(22.5 × EPS × Book Value) — is Benjamin Graham's formula for the maximum price a defensive investor should pay. At 47.2x earnings, SOLS is priced for high growth expectations. Graham's intrinsic value formula yields $18.56 per share, 225% below the current price.

DuPont Decomposition (5-Factor)

The 5-factor DuPont framework breaks Return on Equity into its component drivers — tax efficiency, interest burden, operating profitability, asset utilization, and financial leverage — to reveal what truly drives shareholder returns.

Tax Burden

0.616

NI / EBT

Interest Burden

0.802

EBT / EBIT

EBIT Margin

0.159

EBIT / Rev

Asset Turnover

0.528

Rev / Assets

Equity Multiplier

3.731

Assets / Equity

ROE

15.4%

The 5-factor DuPont identity decomposes ROE as: Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier = ROE. This reveals whether returns are driven by operating performance, financial leverage, or tax efficiency — three very different sources of profitability. SOLS's ROE of 15.4% is driven by financial leverage (equity multiplier: 3.73x). Note: high leverage means ROE is amplified by debt rather than operational performance.

Graham-Dodd Adjusted Valuation

Our adaptation of Graham's growth formula (Fair P/E = 8.5 + 2g) from The Intelligent Investor. The classic version relies on analyst growth projections, which can be unreliable. This adjusted model substitutes the company's realized 3-year EPS CAGR — a backward-looking, verifiable measure of actual earnings power — grounding the valuation in demonstrated performance rather than forecasts.

Two adjustments we make, and why. Growth is capped at 15%. Graham defined g as expected growth over the next seven to ten years, not last year's rate. Across US companies since 1994 the median realized 7-year EPS growth is 5–8% regardless of how fast a company grew beforehand, and of 4,457 company-quarters that grew faster than 200%, none sustained it. Uncapped, the formula assigned fair multiples in the hundreds to companies that had never held that rate — and scored worse than simply reading the P/E. Capped, it carries real information. The verdict has three states, not two. Tested over 377,249 stock-months, this ratio only separates outcomes at its extremes: below 0.25 beat the universe by 1.3 points a year, above 3.0 lagged by 2.7, and everything in between sat inside a one-point band. Rather than call two-thirds of the market "undervalued" on a threshold of 1.0, we say Neutral where the model cannot tell — which is most of the time.

Adj. Growth Rate

0.00%

Fair P/E

8.50x

Intrinsic Value

$13.07

Price/Value

6.78x

Margin of Safety

-577.74%

Premium

577.74%

Assessment

Overvalued

Graham's classic formula uses analyst-projected growth to estimate a fair P/E (8.5 + 2g). Our adjusted version replaces that projection with SOLS's realized 0.0% 3-year EPS CAGR, capped at 15% — demonstrated performance rather than forecasts, held to a rate companies have historically sustained. SOLS trades at a 578% premium to its adjusted intrinsic value of $13.07, suggesting the market is pricing in future growth beyond what historical earnings support. The adjusted fair P/E of 8.5x compares to the current market P/E of 47.2x.

Profitability Trends

Historical profitability ratios tracking how efficiently the company converts revenue into returns for shareholders over time.

Leverage & Solvency Trends

Debt and liquidity metrics showing the company's financial leverage and ability to meet short-term and long-term obligations.

Efficiency & Working Capital Trends

Operating efficiency metrics measuring how quickly the company converts inventory to sales, collects receivables, and manages its cash conversion cycle.

Growth Trends (YoY %)

Year-over-year growth rates for key financial metrics, showing the trajectory of revenue, earnings, and cash flow generation.

Earnings Stability

R-squared of linear regression measuring how predictably revenue, earnings, and margins follow a trend over the trailing 5 years. 1.0 = perfectly predictable; lower values indicate erratic or cyclical behavior.

Monte Carlo Price Simulation

Geometric Brownian Motion with 1,000 antithetic paths over 1 year, seeded from 257 days of historical volatility. Percentile bands show the range of statistically plausible outcomes — this is a statistical model, not a forecast.

Current Price

$62.97

Median 1Y

$70.37

5th Pctile

$28.33

95th Pctile

$177.78

Ann. Volatility

54.6%

Analyst Target

$80.57

25th–75th percentile 5th–95th percentile Median path Historical Analyst target

Workforce & Productivity

Workforce efficiency metrics measuring revenue, profit, and R&D spend per employee — key indicators of operational leverage and human capital productivity.

Employees

4,100

Revenue / Employee

$947,805

Rev: $3,886,000,000

Profit / Employee

$57,805

NI: $237,000,000

SGA / Employee

$102,683

Avg labor cost proxy

R&D / Employee

$23,659

Innovation spend

Scaling Efficiency

All Ratios & Metrics

Complete fundamental data with up to 20 periods of history, sparkline trends, and current values across 13 categories and 130+ financial metrics.

Profitability

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
ROE	2.9%	8.5%	15.4%	15.45%
ROA	0.7%	2.2%	4.1%	4.14%
ROIC	2.3%	6.6%	11.8%	11.81%
ROCE	2.8%	6.8%	11.9%	11.93%
Gross Margin	26.1%	31.9%	32.2%	32.23%
Operating Margin	12.1%	18.2%	19.3%	19.34%
Net Margin	4.2%	8.6%	10.4%	10.37%
EBITDA Margin	16.5%	22.6%	24.3%	24.30%
FCF Margin	6.3%	9.4%	9.9%	9.88%
OCF Margin	16.8%	18.5%	20.1%	20.06%
ROIC Economic	snapshot only			9.75%
Cash ROA	snapshot only			10.59%
Cash ROIC	snapshot only			19.31%
CROIC	snapshot only			9.52%
NOPAT Margin	snapshot only			12.27%
Pretax Margin	snapshot only			12.73%
R&D / Revenue	snapshot only			2.56%
SGA / Revenue	snapshot only			10.94%
SBC / Revenue	snapshot only			0.42%

Valuation

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
P/E Ratio	188.10	96.29	57.61	47.212
P/S Ratio	7.81	6.13	4.52	2.436
P/B Ratio	5.47	8.16	8.90	6.287
P/FCF	124.39	65.58	45.68	45.676
P/OCF	46.46	33.24	22.51	22.510
EV/EBITDA	58.92	35.93	23.69	23.686
EV/Revenue	9.73	7.03	5.05	5.046
EV/EBIT	88.11	50.75	31.80	31.804
EV/FCF	154.90	75.17	51.05	51.052
Earnings Yield	0.5%	1.0%	1.7%	1.74%
FCF Yield	0.8%	1.5%	2.2%	2.19%
Price/Tangible Book	snapshot only			19.548
EV/OCF	snapshot only			25.159
EV/Gross Profit	snapshot only			16.711
Acquirers Multiple	snapshot only			30.278
Shareholder Yield	snapshot only			0.17%
Graham Number	snapshot only			$18.56

Leverage & Solvency

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
Current Ratio	1.39	1.43	1.46	1.459
Quick Ratio	0.98	1.02	1.08	1.081
Debt/Equity	1.72	1.63	1.52	1.520
Net Debt/Equity	1.34	1.19	1.05	1.047
Debt/Assets	0.43	0.42	0.41	0.407
Debt/EBITDA	14.88	6.24	3.62	3.620
Net Debt/EBITDA	11.61	4.58	2.49	2.494
Interest Coverage	4.74	5.27	6.61	6.613
Equity Multiplier	4.02	3.87	3.73	3.731
Cash Ratio	snapshot only			0.426
Debt Service Coverage	snapshot only			8.880
Cash to Debt	snapshot only			0.311
FCF to Debt	snapshot only			0.128
Defensive Interval	snapshot only			1497.1 days

Efficiency & Turnover

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
Asset Turnover	0.17	0.34	0.53	0.528
Inventory Turnover	1.02	1.99	3.28	3.276
Receivables Turnover	1.53	2.10	4.66	4.659
Payables Turnover	0.80	1.54	2.32	2.316
DSO	239	174	78	78.3 days
DIO	358	183	111	111.4 days
DPO	455	237	158	157.6 days
Cash Conversion Cycle	141	120	32	32.2 days
Fixed Asset Turnover	snapshot only			1.470
Operating Cycle	snapshot only			189.8 days
Cash Velocity	snapshot only			4.168
Capital Intensity	snapshot only			1.893

Growth Quality

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
Revenue Stability	—	—	—	—
Earnings Stability	—	—	—	—
Margin Stability	—	—	—	—
Rev. Growth Consistency	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.000
Earn. Growth Consistency	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.000
FCF Positive Streak	0	0	0	0
Earnings Persistence	—	—	—	—
Earnings Smoothness	—	—	—	—
ROE Trend	—	—	—	—
Gross Margin Trend	—	—	—	—
FCF Margin Trend	—	—	—	—
Sustainable Growth Rate	2.9%	7.7%	13.9%	13.93%
Internal Growth Rate	0.7%	2.0%	3.9%	3.88%

Cash Flow Quality

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
OCF/Net Income	4.05	2.90	2.56	2.559
FCF/OCF	0.37	0.51	0.49	0.493
FCF/Net Income	snapshot only			1.261
OCF/EBITDA	snapshot only			0.941
CapEx/Revenue	10.5%	9.1%	10.2%	10.17%
CapEx/Depreciation	snapshot only			1.871
Accruals Ratio	-0.02	-0.04	-0.06	-0.065
Sloan Accruals	snapshot only			0.040
Cash Flow Adequacy	snapshot only			1.833
Earnings Quality Score	snapshot only			0.750

Dividends & Buybacks

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
Dividend Yield	0.0%	0.1%	0.2%	0.36%
Dividend/Share	$0.00	$0.08	$0.15	$0.23
Payout Ratio	0.0%	9.5%	9.8%	9.80%
FCF Payout Ratio	0.0%	6.5%	7.8%	7.77%
Total Payout Ratio	0.0%	9.5%	9.8%	9.80%
Div. Increase Streak	—	0	0	0
Chowder Number	—	—	—	—
Buyback Yield	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.00%
Net Buyback Yield	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.00%
Total Shareholder Return	0.0%	0.1%	0.2%	0.17%

DuPont Factors

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
Tax Burden (NI/EBT)	0.48	0.57	0.62	0.616
Interest Burden (EBT/EBIT)	0.79	0.81	0.80	0.802
EBIT Margin	0.11	0.14	0.16	0.159
Asset Turnover	0.17	0.34	0.53	0.528
Equity Multiplier	4.02	3.87	3.73	3.731

Per Share

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
EPS (Diluted TTM)	$0.26	$0.79	$1.54	$1.54
Book Value/Share	$8.89	$9.33	$9.96	$10.00
Tangible Book/Share	$3.41	$3.89	$4.53	$4.53
Revenue/Share	$6.22	$12.42	$19.62	$25.79
FCF/Share	$0.39	$1.16	$1.94	$1.13
OCF/Share	$1.05	$2.29	$3.94	$3.82
Cash/Share	$3.36	$4.03	$4.71	$4.72
EBITDA/Share	$1.03	$2.43	$4.18	$4.18
Debt/Share	$15.28	$15.17	$15.13	$15.13
Net Debt/Share	$11.92	$11.14	$10.43	$10.43

Academic Models

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
Altman Z-Score	—	—	—	2.976
Altman Z-Prime	snapshot only			5.003
Piotroski F-Score	4	4	4	4
Beneish M-Score	—	—	—	—
Ohlson O-Score	snapshot only			-7.094
ROIC (Greenblatt)	snapshot only			16.91%
Net-Net WC	snapshot only			$-11.06
EVA	snapshot only			$58850251.26

Credit

Metric	Q4'25	Q1'26	Q2'26	Current
Credit Rating	snapshot only			BBB
Credit Score	34.58	48.78	57.74	57.736
Credit Grade	snapshot only			9
Implied Spread (bps)	snapshot only			275.000
Industry Credit Rank	snapshot only			44
Sector Credit Rank	snapshot only			47

SOLS NASDAQ

Edge Score

Analyst Insights

Financial Rating

InsiderStreet Scorecard

Risk & Quality Signals

Valuation

DuPont Decomposition (5-Factor)

Graham-Dodd Adjusted Valuation

Profitability Trends

Leverage & Solvency Trends

Efficiency & Working Capital Trends

Growth Trends (YoY %)

Earnings Stability

Monte Carlo Price Simulation

Workforce & Productivity

Scaling Efficiency

Sign in to InsiderStreet